Author Archives: Taryn Bak

Israel publishes recommendations for development of domestic regulations regarding digital assets (crypto)

Digital Assets (Crypto) - Yetax tax law firm

29-11-2022

Israel’s Ministry of Finance published its Report with recommendations for development of domestic regulations pertaining to the digital asset market.

The report was compiled during 2022 year, by the office of the Chief Economist, in consultation with relevant regulators and government officials, experts and representatives of the local industry, as well as regulators from other countries.

The introspection by Israel’s Ministry of Finance, culminating into the Report, was mainly driven by the fast emerging new regulatory and legislative policies of other countries, and also in anticipation of the developing views of OECD and the recently published EU guidelines regarding “crypto assets”, which saw daylight in October 2022.

The main points of the crypto recommendations are:

Removal of existing barriers and obstacles of the existing regulatory framework: clarifying government policy regarding increasing the certainty of investors in the field, inter alia, by making a decision regarding the existing license applications, increasing activity in the field of enforcement of services provided without a license, and continuing to monitor the implementation of measures to ensure the provision of adequate banking services, under the required risk management, for funds originating from digital assets.

Improvement and expansion of the existing regulatory infra-structure: regulation of powers for the Supervisor of Financial Service Providers with respect to parallel licenses granted abroad, clarifications and creation of mechanisms for paying tax for activity in digital assets for the purpose of removing barriers and increasing certainty, expanding the applicability of the Regulation of the Israel Securities Authority to assets and activities related to digital assets relating to the application of securities laws, and concentrating as much as possible the licensing and supervision powers of financial services and payment services in relation to digital assets in the hands of one regulatory entity while maintaining the principle of technological neutrality .

Creating new regulatory infrastructure: Enshrining licensing and supervision powers in law regarding the issuance and issuance of backed-up digital assets (including stablecoins) and providing financial services through them, including the creation of a mechanism that will be anchored in legislation to transfer the Bank of Israel’s supervision of digital assets with a significant prudential or monetary impact, and the establishment of an inter-ministerial committee to examine the regulation of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO).

As to the recommendations pertaining to new taxation law and compliance, our firm YEtax has an ear on the ground – and not merely because of its expertise and close involvement with digital asset related innovative industries in Israel, but also because of the importance for Israel to facilitate the crypto industry in a pro-active fashion.

Crypto experts at YETAX:

Tali Yaron-Eldar - YETAX

Tali Yaron-Eldar

Henriette Fuchs - Women in Tax

Henriette Fuchs

Israel Digital Assets and Currency

2022 Recommendations Regulations
Israel Digital Assets and Currency

In tradition with the decades long fiscal encouragement of Israel’s Ministry of Finance’s of industry and innovative initiatives, on August 18, 2022 a draft proposal for reinstatement of tax benefits for investors in high tech and innovative companies was published as an intended temporary order for ‘Encouragement of Knowledge-Intensive Industry’ 5772-2022.

Against the background of the expiration at the end of 2019 of previous similar tax benefits under the Budget Law of 2011 – 2012 5771-2011 the proposal seeks to grant, this time around:

  1. a tax credit to an individual, and to certain companies that are ‘individually owned’ or ‘tax transparent’ (as per Sect 76 of the Income Tax Ordinance) and partnership who make an investment in start-up companies up to an amount of 25% of the amount invested (with a maximum of 3,5 M NIS – U$ 1 M);
  2. deferral of tax on a capital gain from the sale of shares of a “preferred company” which owns a “technological enterprise” when a new investment in an R&D company is made, or when there is a share for share exchange;
  3. recognition of the amount of the investment in shares as an expense for tax purposes;
  4. withholding tax exemption for foreign investing ‘financial institutions’ on interest, discount and linkage differentials on convertible loans to a qualifying Israel corporate recipient for financing provided of at least 10 M U$;
  5. a special depreciation on IP for five years when at least 80% control in an Israel based “preferred” company is acquired – at a minimum purchase price of 20 M U$, and the company owns IP in the framework of a ‘technological enterprise’[1] by a qualifying acquirer (of which the average revenue in three previous years over NIS 75 M NIS) Various additional terms apply, among which minimum increases of R&D expenses and the filing of a request for recognition with the innovation authorities. Also such a depreciation is proposed for an Israel based corporate investor which acquires a similar foreign company

If accepted the temporary order would apply until the end of 2025 with a possibility of extension

In parallel an extension has been proposed of the tax benefit of recognition of a deductible capital loss for an investor up to the sum of the invested amount in an Israel based R&D company at the occasion of the public offering of the company. A capital loss may be recognized up to a maximum NIS 5 million (approx. 1,45 M U$). This significant benefit would be in effect, if accepted, until the end of 2028.</

These proposals are still pending today in January 2023 and are expected to revive once the new government of Israel picks up steam.

[1] Law for Encouragement of Capital Investment 1959

Henriette Fuchs - Women in Tax

AUTHOR: <a
Heriette Fuchs

“Angel” Tax Benefits for Investment in Innovation

Israel : Proposals revival “Angel” tax benefits for investment in innovation

In tradition with the decades long fiscal encouragement of Israel’s Ministry of Finance’s of industry and innovative initiatives, on August 18, 2022 a draft proposal for reinstatement of tax benefits for investors in high tech and innovative companies was published as an intended temporary order for ‘Encouragement of Knowledge-Intensive Industry’ 5772-2022.

Against the background of the expiration at the end of 2019 of previous similar tax benefits under the Budget Law of 2011 – 2012 5771-2011 the proposal seeks to grant, this time around:

  1. a tax credit to an individual, and to certain companies that are ‘individually owned’ or ‘tax transparent’ (as per Sect 76 of the Income Tax Ordinance) and partnership who make an investment in start-up companies up to an amount of 25% of the amount invested (with a maximum of 3,5 M NIS – U$ 1 M);
  2. deferral of tax on a capital gain from the sale of shares of a “preferred company” which owns a “technological enterprise” when a new investment in an R&D company is made, or when there is a share for share exchange;
  3. recognition of the amount of the investment in shares as an expense for tax purposes;
  4. withholding tax exemption for foreign investing ‘financial institutions’ on interest, discount and linkage differentials on convertible loans to a qualifying Israel corporate recipient for financing provided of at least 10 M U$;
  5. a special depreciation on IP for five years when at least 80% control in an Israel based “preferred” company is acquired – at a minimum purchase price of 20 M U$, and the company owns IP in the framework of a ‘technological enterprise’[1] by a qualifying acquirer (of which the average revenue in three previous years over NIS 75 M NIS) Various additional terms apply, among which minimum increases of R&D expenses and the filing of a request for recognition with the innovation authorities. Also such a depreciation is proposed for an Israel based corporate investor which acquires a similar foreign company

If accepted the temporary order would apply until the end of 2025 with a possibility of extension

In parallel an extension has been proposed of the tax benefit of recognition of a deductible capital loss for an investor up to the sum of the invested amount in an Israel based R&D company at the occasion of the public offering of the company. A capital loss may be recognized up to a maximum NIS 5 million (approx. 1,45 M U$). This significant benefit would be in effect, if accepted, until the end of 2028.</

These proposals are still pending today in January 2023 and are expected to revive once the new government of Israel picks up steam.

[1] Law for Encouragement of Capital Investment 1959

Henriette Fuchs - Women in Tax

AUTHOR: <a
Heriette Fuchs

Liability for Land Appreciation Tax

Land Appreciation Tax - article by Roy Grilak Yetax Real Estate lawyer

YEtax Real Estate Tax expert Adv. Roy Grilak shares his contribution and additional insights from his interview by Globes Israel on the matter of Land Appreciation Tax

Original Hebrew publication in Globes written by Ela Levi-Weinrib

How will the Supreme Court ruling over capital gains tax affect other cases?

In the case ruling of Shlomo Nehama, the issue in dispute was regarding the liability for Land Appreciation Tax for the sale of a luxury apartment that was sold for NIS 45 million. Immediately after the sale, the tax authority knocked on the Nechama’s door and demanded a tax on the sale. At the heart of the dispute between Nechama and the tax authority was a renovation which he carried out in the luxury apartment he purchased. Until that renovation, the apartment was completely naked (no toilet, shower, kitchen, etc.), and was considered an empty “shell of an apartment.

In the sale of a residential apartment, the seller is granted an exemption from Land Appreciation Tax, while the sale of an apartment shell that is not suitable for living, does not qualify for an exemption. The problems of the tax authority were with the timing of the renovation, with the quality of the finish that is not suitable for a luxury apartment and also with the fact that the purchaser was not interested in the renovation at all and wanted to design the apartment as he wants.

Land Appreciation Tax - article by Roy Grilak Yetax Real Estate lawyer

Following Nechama’s appeal to the District Court, the district ruling determined that this is a legitimate tax planning, which is within the limits of the law. The tax authority did not give up and filed an appeal to the Supreme Court with the claim that the renovation is an artificial transaction, lacks a business purpose and its entire purpose is tax avoidance.

Now, in a long and reasoned ruling, the judges of the Supreme Court ruled by majority opinion that this is not an artificial renovation and that there is no significance to the finish and “prestige” of the renovation or to the gap between it and the level of “prestige” of the apartment. According to them, even turning an empty property into a residential apartment for the sole reason of taxation does not necessarily point to artificiality.

We learn from this ruling that taking an initiative in order to “enter” the scope of tax exemption is a legitimate action. The message that comes out of the ruling is the confirmation of the Supreme Court’s well-known statement that the right to tax planning is part of the taxpayer’s property rights, and he is entitled to economize his steps in order to pay the minimum tax possible. The fact that Nehama hurried before the amendment to the legislation came into force in order to benefit from an exemption from Land Appreciation Tax, is a legitimate tax planning, since he acted in accordance with the law.

It seems that the Supreme Court criticized the position of the Tax Authority by stating that the main goal is the collection of Real Tax, in light of the language of the law and its purpose, and the Tax Authority should not try to give a different interpretation that will result in tax collection at the highest possible rate.

Roy Grilak

AUTHOR:
Roy Grilak

OECD will push for crypto tax and reporting before end of 2024

Digital Assets - YEtax - crypto tax

The market cap of crypto-assets was estimated – at the end of 2021

– close to $3 trillion, and 110 million crypto wallet holders are suspected globally[1]. According to the World Economic Forum, as of March 2022 there are 18,142 crypto-currencies and 460 exchanges. Cryptocurrency and blockchain are here to stay and as they continue to move up into mainstream, their economic significance is too big for the taxing authorities world-wide to ignore.   Governments are hurrying to design new tax and reporting rules for crypto; also for Israel the involvement of its tax payers in virtual currencies has substantial significance, in more than one way.

Many regulating international organizations are eager to develop policies to control, regulate and tax the trading and ownership of crypto.   And this time, again, it is the tax bureau of the OECD who are picking up the glove: the OECD has been preparing for over 2 years to table a proposal for the taxation on crypto and create reporting obligations for virtual transactions.  So now, at the end of March, OECD tabled the first part of its plans, and its’ ambition is to have everything in place by the end of 2024.

The crypto’s speedy history

Only a year after Nakamoto’s 2009 paper on Bitcoin, the first pizza was bought with bitcoin in May 2010, followed by Bitcoin reaching parity with the US dollar already in February 2011. After the launch of Ethereum in 2015, after some critical hard forks in subsequent years, after the first decentralised autonomous organisation (“DAO”) saw daylight, after the 2017-2018 initial coin offerings’ boom, and after the 2019 creation of Libra, starting 2020 also institutional investors investment in virtual assets.

Tax authorities and regulators around the world have been thinking how to tackle the many aspects and challenges of digital currencies. In 2018, the Financial Conduct Authority’s taskforce issued it’s a report regarding crypto-assets followed by other reports from numerous organisations among which the European Central Bank, IMF, European Commission, FATF, the US Federal Reserve, and that of the US Financial Stability board landed this year, in February.

Policy makers are wrestling to figure out which are the right monetary policies, how to secure consumer and investor protection, safeguard market stability, stop money laundering, find suitable accounting rules, and, last but not least, force crypto trading in a tight corset of tax legislation and compliance. All of these should actually encourage the new ecosystem and the development of game-changing technologies in fact serves public interest; their take on matters is not per se hostile to crypto and they are aware that the technologies underlying the world of digital assets offer immense alternative applications, far beyond fin-tech alone.

Unlike conventional monetary means, today, crypto does not involve the intervention by traditional financial intermediaries nor a central administrator  with visibility on crypto ownership or transactions.  A recent research report by the EU claimed that €850 million[2] (US$985 million) in tax could have been collected, on Bitcoin dealings alone (the largest of the virtual currencies) in 2020, when national tax rules would have applied.

Global Tax Ambassador; the OECD

After the OECD’s BEPS tax plans put the dormant OECD organization back on the map in 2015, quire dramatically, it became the ‘legislator of the new international tax order’. So, also this time around OECD’s tax committee will act with the speed of lightening and turn draft crypto tax plans – meant for discussion – into reality in no time, probably also now without stopping a second to breathe or listen.  The same happened with the BEPS reports. It is time to get prepared.

OECD’s obligatory standard for exchange of financial information by banks and financial institutions (the CRS), which was published in 2014, seeks to ensure transparency regarding cross-border financial investments to prevent tax evasion. However, crypto-assets are not under the reach of the current CRS rules. And even if they were, crypto can be owned by individuals in cold wallets or in crypto exchanges that are – today – not under any disclosure obligations.

In its’ original 2015 BEPS Action 1 Report, Taxing the Digital Economy, the OECD already mentioned governments wanting a slice from the global virtual currency trading.

In 2020 the G20 ordered that framework for the exchange of crypto information would be designed, driven by their concern that the invisibility of digital assets undermines global tax transparency. Digital assets such as cryptocurrencies, utility tokens and NFTs bypass traditional intermediaries, like banks and brokers, and conventional tax reporting mechanisms. Any reporting solutions would have to be integrated into the existing global exchange of financial information, the Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”). A report from the Accounting Office of the US government – based on statistics from the US tax authorities – shows that taxpayer compliance is above 95% when third party information reporting exists, while it is below 50% when no such rules exist.

After the OECD put together a first detailed inventory of taxation of crypto world wide, Taxing Virtual Currencies, in 2020, its think-tank set out to develop a plan to achieve  crypto transparency and propose amendments to the CRS to bring new financial assets and crypto intermediaries under its reach.   In the mean-while, the Biden administration already – in March this year – issued an executive order laying out U.S. efforts to regulate the crypto world and its intention to create a US central bank digital currency “CBDC”.    OECD wants to prevent a chaos of regulatory policies across the globe by pulling all countries together in a unified framework.

So, in March this year, OECD released already its’ detailed proposal for a Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (“CARF”) including a set of intended amendments to the global CRS, to embrace crypto. The proposals predict crypto exchange of information bringing ‘digital intermediaries’ under stringent and serious reporting obligations. And OECD wants everything in place by the end of 2024.

CARF

The OECD, EU and US all aim strap the reporting-net around the new generation of digital “middlemen” – digital assets service providers – including crypto exchanges, custodians and crypto wallet providers. Unlike institutions in the conventional financial sector, most digital asset service providers do not yet have systems or process required for the kind of compliance that will be demanded.

The CARF rules are connected to the concepts and due diligence requirements in the current CRS, and the anti-money laundering (AML) and countering financial terrorism (CFT) guidelines; digital currency service providers will have to run know-your-client (KYC) on their customers’, ensure clients are registered with the tax authorities, collect and exchange financial information, ensure data are stored in a compliant manner and classify corporate clients. These are all huge tasks that may require separate compliance departments and dedicated software.  There are not a small burden for small intermediaries.   Certain voices in the industry claim that still disclosure may not be guaranteed, because anyone with a good lap-top can access decentralized finance applications without a traditional custodian or broker allowing circumvention of the reporting rules by setting up an own Bitcoin node.  The CARF is not exhaustively clear which crypto assets are in scope and does not detail which rules apply to decentralised finance (DeFi) and who would be the responsible persons for trading through smart contract transactions, such as a DAO, which have no intermediaries and are accessible by anyone with an internet connection.

Digital service providers may have to comply with OECD’s CRS, EU’s DAC-8 and the US’s FATCA reporting regulations, they will also have to demonstrate that their processes and controls are sufficient, and their directors will be personally responsible for ensuring compliance. In 2021 the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) already ruled that digital asset service providers must obtain a “license” and should be supervised.

The costs of IT solutions and other investments required for service providers will raise a very high barrier for new intermediary businesses wanting to enter the market; and this may actually frustrate market competition.

Tax and reporting of crypto within 2 years

The OECD’s draft of the CARF, predicts that reporting regulations such as the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), the eighth EU Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC-8) and the US’s Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) will soon apply to digital asset service providers, if OECD has it its way, by the end of 2024.

The OECD is now internalizing the responses to its plans from the public received at the end of April, and the basis thereof it will finalise the rules and its’ amendments to the CRS.    The G20 are expecting that the OECD will report back with a final text by October 2022 at the occasion of the next G20 summit. And – as has been customary – the G20 will probably approve without much ado.

[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/647374/worldwide-blockchain-wallet-users/

[2] Thiemann, A. (2021), Cryptocurrencies: An empirical View from a Tax Perspective, JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms No 12/2021, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Seville, JRC126109.

Henriette Fuchs - Women in Tax

AUTHOR:
Henriette Fuchs

Israel proposes to revive tax benefits for (angel) investors in innovation companies

Israel proposes to revive tax benefits for (angel) investors in innovation companies

A draft proposal for a renewal of tax benefits for individual investors

Published on August 18, 2022 as ‘Encouragement of Knowledge-Intensive Industry’ (Temporary Order), 5772-2022.

After previous similar successful tax benefits of the Law for the Budget 2011 – 2012 (Legislative Amendments), 5771-2011 had expired, the renewal proposal aims to give:

  1. a tax credit for an individual, and to certain companies that are ‘individually owned’ or ‘tax transparent’, in relation to an investment in a start-up company of up to an amount of 25% of the amount invested (up to 3,5 M NIS – approx. 3 M U$);
  2. deferral of payment of tax on a gain from the sale of shares of a “preferred company” which owns a “technological enterprise” when a new investment in an R&D company is made, or when there is a share for share exchange;
  3. recognition of the amount of the investment in shares as an “expense” for tax purposes for the individual investor;
  4. an exemption from withholding tax for foreign ‘financial institutions’ on interest, share discounts and linkage differentials, paid by a qualifying Israel company in relation to (convertible) loans received at least 10 M U$ received from such foreign institutions.

In addition, it has been proposed to extend the possibility to recognize a tax offsetable ‘loss’ equal to the amount invested in an Israel R&D company (at the occasion of a public offering) until end of 2028 up to an investment amount of NIS 5 million (approx. 1,45 M U$).

AUTHORS:
Rany Schwartz
and Henriette Fuchs

Rany Schwartz - YEtax News
Henriette Fuchs - Women in Tax

Israel passes Country by Country Reporting into law

Israel passes Country by Country Reporting into law

International Tax Update

July 7, 2022

Yesterday also Israel now has accepted the Country by Country Reporting (“CbCR”) and the obligations for certain companies to maintain and file a Masterfile for transfer pricing reporting purposes into law. By publication of amendment # 261 to the Income Tax Ordinance 1961 (“ITO”) in Israel’s national Gazette the CbC related amendments became a reality in Israel and effective as per reporting year 2022.

Amendment 261 (named “Reporting of Parent Entities of Multinational Groups”) expands Israel’s transfer pricing legislation, previously existing merely of Sec 85A of the ITO into the BEPS realm. A new Section 85 B to the ITO deals with “documentation” and a new Section 85 C to the same law establishes the CbC reporting requirements that apply to a qualifying Israel resident parent company of a multinational group.

A master file should be prepared for any group of companies with a presence in Israel and a group revenue at least NIS 150 million ($45 million approx.)

An Israel resident company which functions as the ultimate parent of a multinational group of which the consolidated turnover is in excess of 3.4 billion shekels ($ 1.1 B) should submit a country by country report.

The set of annual (corporate tax) reporting forms will – starting reporting year 2022 – contain an updated version of the existing (transfer pricing) form, Form 1385. The Form shall, going forward, reflect the requirements for declarations as to a master file and relevant CbCR positions. Note that the status of the Form is that of an integral inseparable part of a company’s reporting obligations and that when management should forget the form or report incorrectly, this may have repercussions for the management who signed the Form, or who did not see to have it included when required

Parliament of Israel (the ‘Knesset’) published the passing into law of Amendment 261 on 6 July 2022.

Explanatory notes from the tax authorities on December 18 2022.

Then in December 2022 the professional department of the Israel Tax Authority (“ITA”) sent out a short explanatory note to the registe- red representatives* of tax-payers maintaining tax files in Israel regarding initial explanations pertaining to some of the practical implementation of the Country by Country reporting requirements (“CbC”) by tax payers to whom the requirements apply.

After Amendment 261 to the Income Tax Ordinance the expansion of the Income Tax Regulations (Determination of Market Conditions) 5766-2006, an Israel resident company at the top of a multinational group with a consolidated turn-over of over NIS 3.4 billion (close to U$ 100B) must submit required materials regarding all entities in its’ group beginning with the 2022 within 12 months from the end of the tax year. The ITA will then transmit the CbC data required to foreign tax authorities in the framework of the automatic exchange of information.

The ITA instructs that an annual report an XML file) be filed online containing financial data and nature of business information, regarding all entities in the Group. These data will be transferred in ‘automatic exchange’ to other countries where entities of the group are, but only to reciprocating countries. An Israel based parent company of a qualifying group may file the required CbC report in another relevant country, provided the company notifies by the end of the relevant tax year that it will use this option. A parent entity in Israel is also given the choice the interested to already notify by 31-03-2023 that a CbC report regarding 2021 (by choice) has been filed already in another country.

An Israel resident entity which belongs to a CbC qualifying multina- tional group, but is not the top company of the group, will report to the Israel Tax Authority, tax year starting regarding the tax year 2022 in which country the group has submitted its report. To this end, Form 1585, which is in the making, shall become an integral part of the required materials for filing an annual tax report. Note that the non-filing of the Form may render the annual tax filings incomplete and hence unprotected by statute of limitations and personal liability of the corporate functions and persons held responsible for the complete filing of the annual tax returns. Part of the Forms need also be reported via a designated email.

An Israel resident entity which is not the final parent entity in the filing ()local multinational group will report in which country the multinational group’s report was submitted (along with identifying details including: entity name ,entity number, multi- national group name, name of the final parent entity and tax identification number (and contact details) to IsraelCBCrLFN@taxes.gov.il

If there are several Israeli resident entities belonging to the same group, they can be reported about in one filing. Detailed further instructions for filling out the required CbC reports are expected to be published shorty.

In case you have any questions regarding transfer pricing or international tax matters please feel free to approach us   

*.. Officially registered licensed “representatives of tax payers” of whom the identity is maintained in a data base of the ITA

 

 

AUTHOR: Henriette Fuchs

Our firm’s international tax & transfer pricing capabilities shall be happy to receive your queries.

Partner Rany Schwartz And His Team Appointed IBFD Israel Correspondent

Partner Rany Schwartz and his team appointed IBFD Israel correspondent

YEtax boasts Israel correspondent to leading international provider of cross-border tax expertise

Partner Rany Schwartz, veteran tax professional and renowned fiscal litigator, and his team, have been appointed as Israel correspondent to the reputable International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation  

Going forward, Advocate Schwartz and his team will update as to any tax related news straight off the legislative-press and directly from the Israel courts to this very authoritative tax data organization.

Rany Schwartz - YEtax Partner Tax Litigation Israel
Rany Schwartz - YEtax News
Skip to content